FANDOM

Zer0issilent

aka the one who shall not speak his name.

  • I live in Pandora.
  • My occupation is Level 72 Psycho
  • I am Male
(Difference between revisions) | User:Zer0issilent
(edits: new section)
Line 8: Line 8:
   
 
house of ned is not the name of the dlc. grammar maters. {{:User:Dr. Clayton Forrestor/sig}} 23:26, July 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
house of ned is not the name of the dlc. grammar maters. {{:User:Dr. Clayton Forrestor/sig}} 23:26, July 27, 2013 (UTC)
  +
  +
==Your Block==
  +
If someone reverts your edit, please review the update comments, and if you still fail to see what the problem is, or disagree with the revert, take the matter to the article talk page, or the editor's talk page. We cannot have back and forth edit warring. Your block was extended further than is typical for this kind of issue because you took the liberty to push your view point back in on so many articles.
  +
  +
As for some of the initial reverts of your edits, they were done for, unneeded character-to-character comparisons, removal links from damage forms, capitalisation of common nouns, and inserting incongruous notes into the middle of paragraphs, among other things. In general terms, in some of your updates you were introducing around three problems whilst addressing about one grammatical oversight. -- [[User:WarBlade|WarBlade]] ([[User talk:WarBlade|talk]]) 02:34, May 4, 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:34, May 4, 2014

Welcome

Welcome to Borderlands Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Dwarfzerker page. We hope you will continue to be a regular contributor, and will help us improve the wiki!

Categorize
Please remember to categorize new images uploaded to the wiki. Uncategorized and or unpublished images will be deleted. Thank you.


Please leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything! I'll be happy to help. WarBlade (talk) 21:49, July 26, 2013 (UTC)

edits

house of ned is not the name of the dlc. grammar maters.   Dr. F    Chemicalweapon   Wordpress shovel   Boston globe bullhorn  23:26, July 27, 2013 (UTC)

Your Block

If someone reverts your edit, please review the update comments, and if you still fail to see what the problem is, or disagree with the revert, take the matter to the article talk page, or the editor's talk page. We cannot have back and forth edit warring. Your block was extended further than is typical for this kind of issue because you took the liberty to push your view point back in on so many articles.

As for some of the initial reverts of your edits, they were done for, unneeded character-to-character comparisons, removal links from damage forms, capitalisation of common nouns, and inserting incongruous notes into the middle of paragraphs, among other things. In general terms, in some of your updates you were introducing around three problems whilst addressing about one grammatical oversight. -- WarBlade (talk) 02:34, May 4, 2014 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.