Borderlands Wiki
(→‎Infobox Caption: new section)
m (→‎Infobox Caption: missed the forum)
Line 397: Line 397:
 
== Infobox Caption ==
 
== Infobox Caption ==
   
Really? We're going to have conversations in the edit summary? Bring the discussion here before this becomes a problem. -- {{User:Airos/sig3}} 20:01, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
+
<s>Really? We're going to have conversations in the edit summary? Bring the discussion here before this becomes a problem.</s> -- {{User:Airos/sig3}} 20:01, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
  +
:Didn't notice the forum. -- {{User:Airos/sig3}} 20:05, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:05, 19 June 2011

Seems to be wrong i have a ZPR43 C Vitriolic Crux with x4 Corrosive and a very high elemental chance.

It happens. --Nagamarky 10:43, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Varieties

Level Model Prefix Damage Acc. Fire Rate Mag. Notes    Image   
48 ZPR10 Vitriolic 100 x 7 41.7 1.9 5 Corrosive x3 [Weapon 1]
34 SG Vitriolic 62 x 7 74.6 1.3 5 Corrosive x3
3.0x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 2]
43 SG43 C Vitriolic 88 x 7 40.3 1.3 7 Corrosive x4 [Weapon 3]
43 SG30 Vitriolic 81 x 7 74.6 1.3 5 Corrosive x3
61 BA Vitriolic 154 x 7 25.3 1.0 5 Corrosive x3 [Weapon 4]
43 ZPR10 C Vitriolic 95 x ? 53.3 1.9 5 Corrosive x4
3.0x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 5]
25 SG Pestilent 43 x ? 61.1 1.3 5 Corrosive x4 [Weapon 6]
43 SPR Vitriolic 80 x 7 41.7 1.0 5 Corrosive x3
43 SG10 Vitriolic 81 x 7 25.3 1.3 5 Corrosive x3
4.0x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 7]
25 ZX Pestilent 42 x ? 74.6 1.6 5 Corrosive x4
4.5x Weapon Zoom
48 SG30 Vitriolic 86 x ? 53.3 1.3 5 Corrosive x4 [Weapon 8]
48 ZPR10 Vitrolic 124x7 40.3 1.9 5 Corrosive x4
4.0x Weapon Zoom
48 BA Vitrolic 100 x7 41.7 1.0 5 Corrosive x3
34 SPR10 Vitiolic 72 x 7 25.3 1.0 5 Corrosive x3
48 ZX10 Pestilent 88 x7 25.3 1.6 5 Corrosive x4
48 SPR10 C Vitriolic 100 x 7 53.3 1.0 5 Corrosive x4
4.0x Weapon Zoom
48 BA 30 Vitriolic 116 x 7 74.6 1.0 5 Corrosive x3
4.5x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 9]
37 SG10 B Vitriolic 95 x 7 58.6 1.3 5 Corrosive x4
4.5x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 10]
34 BA 10 Vitriolic 67 x 7 41.7 1.0 5 Corrosive x3
4.0x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 11]
48 ZPR43 C Fatal 134 x 7 77.1 1.9 7 Corrosive x4
2.5x Weapon Zoom
43 ZPR43 C Vitriolic 95 x 7 53.3 1.9 7 Corrosive x4
2.5x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 12]
58 SG30 Vitriolic 116 x 7 25.3 1.3 5 Corrosive x3
4.0x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 13]
57 ZPR30 C Vitriolic 152 x 7 77.1 1.9 5 Corrosive x4
3.0x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 14]
48 ZPR30 Vitriolic 129 x 7 55.1 1.9 5 Corrosive x4
4.0x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 15]
60 ZPR43 C Pestilent 179 x 7 62.4 1.9 7 Corrosive x4
4.0x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 16]
50 ZPR30 C Vitriolic 159 x 7 77.1 1.9 5 Corrosive x4
4.5x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 17]
48 ZPR10 Vitriolic 100 x 7 41.7 1.9 5 Corrosive x3
4.5x Weapon Zoom
68 ZPR10 C Vitriolic 189 x 7 77.1 1.9 5 Corrosive x4
4.5x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 18]
55 ZPR43 C Vitrolic 185 x 7 77.1 1.9 7 Corrosive x4
4.5x Weapon Zoom
67 ZPR20 C Vitrolic 185 x 7 77.1 1.9 5 Corrosive x4
4.0x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 19]

&nbsp

37Crux


I added another example, lvl 50, 159x7 damage, x4 corrosive, 4.5x zoom, 77.1 accuracy, 1.9 fire rate. First time editing this kind of wiki though, so hope I didn't break anything. (GeneratorOfChaos 22:55, September 10, 2010 (UTC))

I have one, level 23, 51 x 7 damage, x3 corrosive, 4.5x zoom, 74.6 accuracy, model is SPR10

The one I have is a level 43, SG43 Vitrolic Crux. About 69 damage x7 bullets a shot.

Accuracy is 41.7 and the Fire Rate is 1.3
Zoom is 3.0x and High Elemental Chance.

SG43 Pestilent Crux

I just got a Lv 43 SG43 Pestilent Crux, damage: 78 x7 accuracy: 61.1 rate of fire: 1.3 no scope x4 corrosive

Highest Post Knoxx Version

Does anyboday know what the highest dmg/fire rate post knoxx for this gun is Thanks!


I listed my Crux looted from Crawmerax in the table above.

Cross Pattern

All the Crux's I got shoot the pellets in a horizontal cross pattern, and I think every other Crux does that. Can anyone confirm this (by telling us if your Crux shoot in a cross pattern also)?

I think you'll find that all your Crux's are S&S Crux's (which do shoot in a horizontal cross pattern). This is the Maliwan Crux page, and if my Maliwan Vitriolic Crux is typical of all Maliwan Crux's, they don't shoot a cross pattern: they just shoot a normal random scatter pattern like most any other shotgun.
I see. Bad mistake on my part. But thank you for the quick explanation. Having two different guns with the same name made by two different manufacturers are easily confused. Warmonger256 11:43, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
@monger that is because this weapon was supposed to be called maliwan plague. hence the pythonism. The Evil Dr. F - Chemicalweapon
Just for reference, it's a Maliwan SG10 B Vitriolic Crux, Damage: 97 X 7; Accuracy: 32.7; Fire Rate: 1.3; Magazine: 5; Corrosive X 3; No scope. Outbackyak 18:00, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Found one a little better than listed

I'll try to update as necesarry.T0yz 13:31, December 2, 2010 (UTC)

ZPR10 C Vitriolic Crux (lvl 68)







UPDATE: I found one better than T0yz's shotgun. gggorillaz 6:48, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

File:Gggorillaz's shotgun.jpeg

Only lacks -4 damage; otherwise it's so far truly perfect.


To be honest I don't see how your gun is any better than T0yz. other than having a larger magazine size, the damage is slightly less, did it also have a x7 multiplier dmg? if not, then its pretty much the same. eh? Razl 07:10, February 11, 2011 (UTC)


Yeah, it is a x7 multiplier, I got lazy and didnt want to edit the picture >.> The slight damage reduction is really made up with the extended magazine in my opinion. Think of it as 2 more shots while T0yz gun would still be in the process of reloading. Also, as a side note, the level requirement is glitched. In my inventory it's a level 68 required gun, but it's listed (obviously) as a level 55 requirement while equipped. Does anyone have thoughts on this? Maybe a page redirect? gggorillaz 02:03, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Check this page and read the last of the Notes section at the bottom. 90.202.16.44 07:03, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

Infobox Caption

Really? We're going to have conversations in the edit summary? Bring the discussion here before this becomes a problem. -- Airos 20:01, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Didn't notice the forum. -- Airos 20:05, June 19, 2011 (UTC)