Borderlands Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
   
 
{{Weapon table start}}
 
{{Weapon table start}}
  +
 
{{Weapon table row
 
{{Weapon table row
 
|level = 31
 
|level = 31
Line 34: Line 35:
 
|magazine = 6
 
|magazine = 6
 
|notes = 2.8x Weapon zoom, 3x corrosive
 
|notes = 2.8x Weapon zoom, 3x corrosive
  +
}}
}}{{Weapon table row
+
{{Weapon table row
 
|level = 46
 
|level = 46
 
|model = GGN 350
 
|model = GGN 350
Line 44: Line 46:
 
|notes = Shock x3, 2.8x Weapon Zoom, Purple
 
|notes = Shock x3, 2.8x Weapon Zoom, Purple
 
|image =
 
|image =
  +
}}
}} {{Weapon table end}}
+
{{Weapon table end}}
   
 
== Enhanced scope quality with Hawkeye title? ==
 
== Enhanced scope quality with Hawkeye title? ==

Revision as of 13:05, 17 February 2010

Varieties

They all have +150% Critical Hit Damage unless otherwise noted.

Level Model Prefix Damage Acc. Fire Rate Mag. Notes    Image   


31 DVL30 ZZ Fearsome 512 98.9 0.3 6 1.6x Weapon Zoom [Weapon 1]
48 GGN C Cobalt 416 98.7 0.6 6 Explosive x2
1.4x Weapon Zoom
[Weapon 2]
34 GGN30 C Vitriolic 279 98.7 0.6 6 2.8x Weapon zoom
3x corrosive
46 GGN 350 Lightning 416 98.7 0.7 6 Shock x3
2.8x Weapon Zoom
Purple

Enhanced scope quality with Hawkeye title?

I'm not positive on this, but it seems the Hawkeye title not only increases accuracy, but also increases the quality of the attached scope by slightly increasing the zoom multiplier. Typically from what I can tell, sniper scopes come in the following varieties: 1.0; 1.5; 1.8 (aka TV scope); 2.0; 2.4; and 2.7 (ignoring Atlas Cyclops' 3.2). I happen to have a Jakobs ZZ Fearsome Hawkeye with what I think is the 2.4 quality scope, but the stats says it has a 2.5 zoom. I don't have the PC version and lack a digital camera so I can't take a screenshot, but this could be useful information. If some other users could help confirm that the Hawkeye title increases scope quality or not it would be appreciated. StarPilot 23:48, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

I added a vitriolic variety, but I'm not sure how to get the pics that were already there to appear on it's own row..sorry.