Forum:Legit Weapons or Not?

I'm quite wary on whether or not the weapons I've gotten from trades or dupes are legit or not. Nowadays with the rampant influx of constructs, it's hard to tell. So I present to you guys five weapons I'd like for you to determine if they're constructs. I'm most suspicious of the weapons with a sell value of $9,999,999. In case photos are too hard to read, I'll also type up the stats.

I've never heard of the "Max" prefix until I came across this Ogre. I can't help but feel it's a construct. It's very powerful; almost *too* powerful.

L61, 364 dmg, 91.3 acc, 12.5 RoF, 55 clip, x4 Explosive, +61% recoil reduction, +100% dmg, hidden 2.0x+ zoom

I've seen plenty of variations of the Maliwan Crux. I've been told before it's a construct. I have owned a legit Crux with a 4.5x zoom, so I'm not sure.

L61, 182x7 dmg, 62.4 acc, 1.9 RoF, 7 clip, x4 Corrosive, 4.5x zoom

Much like the previous two weapons, this HellFire feels overpowered. Highest originally owned HellFire dmg I've seen was around 150.

L61, 233 dmg, 89.2 acc, 12.5 RoF, 55 clip, x4 Incindiary, 4.3x zoom

These last two doesn't fall into the "$9,999,999" category. They just seem too strong.

Based on the talk pages, it would seem that all 'Takers are supposed to have an 88.8 acc. As you can see, this one deviates from the norm.

L61, 2419 dmg, 97.2 acc, 1.6 RoF, 10 clip, 4.3x zoom, +59% Fire Rate, +90% dmg

I've never originally earned a FireHawk this good before.

L61, 342 dmg, 92.6 acc, 3.5 RoF, 20 clip, x4 Incindiary, 4.7x zoom

Fortunately, I do have "lower powered" original versions of these weapons. Any feedback would be appreciated.

-- Serge311 15:09, June 30, 2010 (UTC)