User blog comment:Chuckmoney/Wiki remains biased against the Storm/@comment-3312380-20131217135655

This seems like a troll session. The first claim is false. There was one edit made that talked about Gaige and it was reverted. The author of the revert changed his mind and added a non-subjective view. Perhaps incorrect memory?

The last claim is incite-full. This is a wiki about a game, not student problems locating sources in a lazy way.

I am a liaison on this wiki and my position was created because of any perceived problem with one version favored over another.

I appreciate when someone has a "bitch" about something but this whole blog was created because of a single revert that happened 8 months ago.

The first thing you should do is take a step back and figure out what can be learned from this.

Firstly, why are you so attached to your edit? Secondly, what facts can you give to the page that are not biased? Thirdly, which college could you attend that allows citation of borderlands wiki?

I think you might be much happier if you self examine and answer those questions.

Doing something productive on the page of the gun you love works much better than trying to incite the "higher ups" over one modification of one edit.