User talk:InfinitysCross

Welcome
Welcome to Borderlands Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the '''User blog:Fryguy42/Gearbox announces the Mechromancer DLC. Thoughts?''' page. We hope you will continue to be a regular contributor, and will help us improve the wiki!

Please leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything! I'll be happy to help. -- Fryguy42 (Talk) 22:38, April 9, 2012
 * For a detailed list of all our available admins, check out Borderlands Wiki:Active Mods

vandilism
crack,

we should try and design a filtering system to prvent vandilism or quick back ups to delete and repair the damage. do you know any scripts for this?

but wikia or the admin should try and make a script the judges and filters certim words used in edits...it could greatly help

I will ask a friend in real life about it I can never find thoose sy=mbols on my key board!:P but I'll try to rememberThemecanist (talk) 05:37, October 7, 2012 (UTC)themecanist

come discuss Law
Talk:Law (Borderlands 2) Input is desired thanks, asking everyone keep it civil, no revert wars -Raisins (talk) 07:34, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the compliment. Yeah, Allegiance relics would make them OP, but these classes are extremely challenging, because you only get the bonuses from their Loyalty tree with guns of their maker, forcing players to play with a very limited style. Their other trees contain good skills, at least they will when I design them, but to get the most out of each class, you have to use only their particular gun makers. Besides, if Gearbox does include something like these classes, they would probably take care of balancing issues.

ubx
04:41, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

thank you
...for your support in my recent (successful) RfA. your support will not be forgotten in the coming days of the revolution.

your newest benevolent dictator,

20:16, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

Trivia revert
Do you mean this reference page? I can't seem to find any other and there's not even a word on MLP there. Plus, on several other pages (I just followed links at random on the page) it's also mentioned aside from the pop culture reference list. Keeping notes of it on the page itself is done on most other gaming wikis so people will keep adding these notes anyway. --El_Nazgir 22:48, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. However, the reason I had undone your undo was to try to change the way the article sounds. As it was before my initial edit, the article sounded like the main way to get Seraph items was to kill the Guardians until they dropped them, rather than to collect the crystals and use them to buy the weapons from the Seraph Vendors. Joeshmo101 (talk) 01:48, January 18, 2013 (UTC)

Just a quick head up, bandits in borderlands 2 really do shout what I posted on the attack. I must have heard it at least once every time I visited a place with psycho's in it.

psycho semen
id always thought he was saying steeee-ven. is it subtitled as semen? 13:08, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

delete template
The template is simply " " (see delete). You can also use " " for obvious mess ups. You can also (should) add a parameter quickly explaining why the page warrants a delete, for example " ".

In any case, there is no problem messing up. happypal (talk &bull; contribs) 10:45, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

The template is. You can also use  for pages you are the author of, obvious vandalism and what not. Finally, you can (should) add a quick rationale in the first parameter, eg:. See Template:delete for more info.

In any case, no problem. happypal (talk &bull; contribs) 11:00, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

EDIT: Sorry for the double post, my connection to internet connection to borderlands.wikia has been exceptionally flaky lately. happypal (talk &bull; contribs) 11:12, February 1, 2013 (UTC) "

Pictures
Could you perhaps avoid uploading pictures irrelevant to the Boarderlands series?


 * I was going to ask if there was a Barkley wiki that you could "let it out" on LOL. Perhaps you could create one :) Trig Anomaly (talk) 09:41, February 5, 2013 (UTC) I think I messed up your talk page also.

I appreciate it.
I actually forgot about the references page, so thank you for the reminder, it's really appreciated! :) Abyss Raider (talk) 21:36, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

P.S. There were some strange formatting issues going on with your page, I think I got them all fixed up, though...

bonus package
I plan on trying the bonus package with double your fun, is there a reason I shouldn't? Trig Anomaly (talk) 09:22, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

I have learned to look at more than one page to get a bigger picture. I thought the bonus package was more of a strategy/combination thing since its on more than one page. If its not a legitimate combo, it needs to come off all the pages. I guess that is why I am wondering if its legit. Trig Anomaly (talk) 18:03, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

I guess our opinions differ in that respect. Note that I cannot speak for the bonus package/double your fun combo but combinations of weapons/class mods/skills that are established to be effective, I consider strategy. Personal preference would be why you wouldn't use an established combination. If there is a better combination for double your fun, or if it is largely just a matter of preference, I would like to know.

There definately should be the most effective combinations mentioned, if there are any. grenades are definately better in BL2; in BL1 everyone just (never) used transfusion grenades unless they needed some corrosive damage or liked using less effective weapons because the game was easy and it was fun or to get a certain effect. Like I said, if its just a matter of personal preference and there are no "best" grenades, then you would be right in the opinion thing. Trig Anomaly (talk) 07:59, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

Hi

The primary reason for the edit to the 'Grave Matter' page was that if you want to know where the slabs are, the reference to Poetic Licence does not tell you, since that page does not explain the site of the various elements (in this case, the guy who hangs himself on the tombstone).

Therefore, if you are coming back to the level to do the challenges a long time after having done it the first time, the page as is is less than helpful.

The page is also very badly written but I don't pretend to be an expert on the wiki style guide. If you don't like my edits I really won't lose any sleep over it but leaving a badly written, uninformative page to stand just doesn't make a great deal of sense to me.

Huggydaddybear (talk) 23:29, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

Relic undo party
What would those reasons be? A quick review of the a few of the relic pages was not enlightening. Please elucidate. Dämmerung 06:02, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Just passing by. Beautiful use of elucidate.  Keep up the good work!  06:10, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * (PS: I am slightly mental today. Ignore me as usual)


 * You need to imagine it in a Jamaican accent for proper effect.  Dämmerung 06:21, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Mind blown. 18:13, February 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * I would also like to know why you reverted my edits. I added the numbers because the page about Vitality relic has the maximum possible percentage but pages about some other relics didn't. I figured the number would be useful for players to determine if their version of the relic is the best possible version. --CharredBrain (talk) 18:08, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

About Law...
As I stated in my talk page, I wasn't aware of the discussion. I thought I was helping. I'll leave my hands off that page.

While I'm here, though, maybe you could clear up some confusion. It says " a play on the musical phrasing 'la-di-da.' " Musical phrasing? Maybe I just don't get it, but after 13 years of musical training I've never run into "la-di-da". I have run into it in this context With the way it's written, it seems to be referencing the end of the solfege "do-re-mi-fa-so- la-ti-do ". I just want to point out that it's confusing. Whether it gets altered or not is up to you and the admins.

Grindfest (talk) 21:02, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

round it off already
add one more, just one more barkley picture and.... well, you will get 1000 edits --- congrats 04:06, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

P.S. Your username should be BakleyCrackAddict 04:12, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

UofD
User of the Day award is an older practice by users for users. I am not sure on the policy but, since its not being used, I will count my vote as enough. 18:22, April 21, 2013 (UTC) P.S. you have 2 choices now... you can delete it or put it where you like in your profile.

I don't get how putting Krieg's possible release date is vandalism if it's been confirmed. Krieg has been confirmed by Gearbox as a new character there is a page for him. So are you going to tell me all of that is vandalism? An admin has not told me anything about my edit except that I didn't put an edit summary. Nice try though but remember You can&#39;t tame the blaze... (talk) 13:36, April 27, 2013 (UTC) BlazerThree

reference policy
You need to be more specific on which policy was broken... a general "trivia policy" doesnt work if I cant see anything broken when I read the policy itself. 08:51, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

P.S. Im talking about the salvador page, to save you from searching. 08:53, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

nudge
Hiya! just thought I would bump into you and ask where you been? I thought you was gunna chat mod. We miss ya. 19:22, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * I can only speak for myself, but I tend to not join chat rooms if there is another chat mod in there. It helps prevent conflicts when opinions on how to handle an issue differ. If you have Steam, you can contact both me and Crack that way. I'm literally ALWAYS on...except when I am not. 20:18, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

Ahh, I was just referring to his being a bit absent in general. I wanted him to meet kettle but maybe its just a timing thing. WHERE ARE YOU CRACKL???

P.S. If I step into chat with another mod, I would just defer to the mod who was there before me. (crackl cant have all the fun, now can he) Seems like a good guideline, anyway. 08:28, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

Well welcome back... good to have ya. Did you happen to tell them that rules are for admins and not users? :D 01:39, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

recruit
I have a project if your interested. I am contacting all users who chimed in on splitting the class mod page.

We need to re-link all Class Mod links.

The borderlands 2 pages should link to Class Mod (Borderlands 2) and the borderlands pages should link to Class Mod (Borderlands).

The tool Special:WhatLinksHere/Class_Mod is what we can use to find them all. Note that the links should look like this: Class Mod or Class Mod in the source.just saying

I will do what I can until the weekend, and be able to pound out a bunch then.

Ignore anything other than article pages for now. If we all work on it, the list will diminish rather quickly.

It is also a good way to get edit counts up, if you are interested in those.

This mission, if you choose to accept it, will self destruct in 5 seconds. 08:15, May 7, 2013 (UTC)

Trivia policy
Currently there is no policy on trivia sections that state that everything in the pop culture reference page (which is completely bloated) cannot be on a main article. Please explain your interpretation of the Borderlands_Wiki:Trivia_policy that would overrule the Borderlands_Wiki:Simplified_ruleset policy #8. Perhaps it is time to start a forum/blog asking for policies to be changed/tweaked. 14:07, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

P.S. I am talking about the Zero page, to save you from searching. 14:09, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

No harm, no foul... Trivia is the most confusing policy/practice on this wiki. I had to get re-acquainted with it myself. I do know that peeps will want to see it on the main page and keep adding it. Like I said, if you think that it should change, make a blog/forum on the subject and see what the community says. 20:25, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

Actually if you read the Bloodwing page it'll even say in the quotes "HaHa! Good Boy!", and even on Mordecai's page in his quote section for Killing an enemey with Bloodwing "Good boy", but if you can provide a video where he says that whilst downing an enemy i'd believe you. DapperNoob (talk) 02:44, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

I apologize I misread that page, i'd hope that you accept my apology and my foolishness.DapperNoob (talk) 19:37, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

Isn't the purpose of a wiki to gather information? So why do you edit my post adding the info that the Norfleet can drop from Hyperius? More than that, yes it drops more often from Vermi, but Hyperius is easier to farm. The " Increased drop rates frm Vermi, not Hyperius" is not a valid reason to remove information IMO

DaisZen (talk) 22:47, June 3, 2013 (UTC)

And so, the fact that the Norfleet has only 2 drop sources (Vermivorous and Hyperius) isn't an information? I didn't just add the "Hyperius might be easier", but also the fact that you can get Hyperius drop it. And that isn't an opinion, it's a fact.

Anyway, now I understand why some pages aren't up to date if some informations are considered as "opinions".

DaisZen (talk) 22:58, June 3, 2013 (UTC)

Wot
Penis goblin.Sh!ft (talk) 19:47, June 4, 2013 (UTC)

Klerik
* cough* abuse of power!
 * You brought this upon yourself, from what I understand. Not only is it not abuse, it is proper and perfect usage of power.  It would be abuse if he permabanned you.  Now settle down before you DO get permabanned.  23:33, June 6, 2013 (UTC)

alias
had to check alias'. was like "ok, but who are you?" 01:15, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Definition of "vandalism"
Saw your reverts in S:RC, and I'd like to clear up that saying someone is vandalizing when they're merely changing spelling (based on locale) is kinda wrong because they do it in good faith. Vandalism is editing with the intent to do bad for the wiki, bad edits are a different thing. MLGisNot4Me talk 17:58, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Surely I understand rules are different at other wikis, but it's kinda like a general rule that edits done in good faith aren't vandalism. If some people are blocked for it, I would assume they do it constantly (where he ignores warnings and only blocking will stop them), something else was involved with the situation, or the blocking admin was really hot-headed. Ah well, glad you got what I said. MLGisNot4Me talk 19:01, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * (\ MLGisNot4Me talk 19:03, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

'Vandalism' on the Pandora page
Would like to point out that, first, it wasn't vandalism, and, second, I was making a point. If you're really worried something isn't going to be accepted, then change it so that it will be; don't leave a comment explaining why it's okay in the article. Snowskeeper---Till Hell Freezes Over. (talk) 18:53, June 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * I wasn't starting an edit war. You'll notice that I didn't re-edit it after you changed it back (despite the fact that apparently you don't think that's something people should do according to this post?). I was explaining my rationale to you. Snowskeeper---Till Hell Freezes Over. (talk) 18:58, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism is when you cannot "assume good faith". Spell checking in any version of English is not vandalism. The ban you saw was because the UNDO took away addition of the page and also, in the process, changed the spelling as well. It was misinterpreted by both parties at the time. Check the history of the page, if you cant find it I will link it after work. 19:47, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

It is extremely possible that I misinterpreted it. Assuming anything is at worst complete crap and at best faulty science. I will clarify the events. The orgininal [edit] changed the spelling and put a "see also" section. Assuming good faith, the edit was not vandalism but a spell check from mozilla browser. The NEXT edit shows an admin (who knows what he is doing) UNDO the edit and keep the "see also" section with a warning on breaching policy. The NEXT edit was Mad with a UNDO (edit war) with a edit summary about the "format" of the page. Assuming good faith, Mad just did not see that the "see also" section was kept and his undo was about the "see also" section, not the spelling. Which ironically undid the section and put back the spelling. War, on the other hand (assuming good faith) thought that it was about the spelling and given whatever history (i did not concern myself with any history, just this incident) gave a ban. Note that war was lenient about the incident, even though he seen some sort of history.

My note on War's page was only to point out (probably poorly) any misinterpretation and put forth a record, in case a similar thing happened with the same user.

Did I get it wrong? probably... the point is that we must "assume good faith" on all wiki edits. Its not perfect but unless you think that someone is intentionally doing harm to the wiki, you must assume good faith.

We definately do not ban on this wiki for people who want to spell check and add proper sections. We, in fact, encourage it. However, that means that some maintainence is required to keep original authors acceptible spellings. Its just a side affect of the policy. 07:07, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

Unexpected Ban
Hey Crack. It appears that I've been banned from chat. I'm not sure if this is a joke from one of the other chat mods, or simply a mistake, but I'd just like to find out why.

Louis Bancroft (talk) 20:29, June 11, 2013 (UTC)

Hey Crack, again. Turns out I was banned by MadCrayolaz for a year for "misbehaving in chat". Could you talk to him about it? If anything, it seems like abuse of power. Thanks man.

Louis Bancroft (talk) 14:18, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Would you like me to address it here? I'd imagine if you wanted to know why, you could just, I don't know, leave a message on my own wall?  Post where you want me to respond, and I'll do so.  15:32, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

Why?
Why would you change your username? It may be none of my business, but that's going to be annoying - especially since you're a chat mod... On a different note... You can change your username!? Sakuretsu115 (talk) 13:20, June 14, 2013 (UTC)

Wasn't it this before? Snowskeeper---Till Hell Freezes Over. (talk) 16:40, June 14, 2013 (UTC)

Re: About AoDK Content Pre-Release
Thanks for your support with Louis. I wasn't sure back there if we should even be adding speculation - since none of it was really sourced. Whatever, right? Also, thanks for that link for all those images (w/o watermark. woohoo!); I think my AoDK appetite has been satiated... for now. Or at least until the 25th. Sakuretsu115 (talk) 20:59, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your input
The template is done. Thanks for your input and if you want to add anymore, now is the time. 09:41, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

Previous version reverts
You can UNDO previous versions and revert the page back to a certain point as well as a standard UNDO. You go to the history and select which specific edit to to revert. Note that this takes away any edits done after that.

Alternatively, you can PREV (preview) the edits and scroll through until you find the one to revert back to.

Note that reverting in this way is more reliable than a rollback button (tool) supplied to admins and rollbackers. Its just a better way in general.

A summary describing which edit the page was reverted to is customary and less confusing. 02:25, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

Report unnecessary
Hi there,

I was trying to edit the Ogre (Borderlands 2) page but someone edited it before I could publish my own edit. Then another user edited it with nonsense code. I did not mean to publish the nonsense code page.

Please remove me from the report a user page.

Thanks. CarlRaven 03:30, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

lvl 49 UVHM
Can you expand on that? was your friend joining or making games in UVHM? Obviously, TVHM was completed... but was your friend able to host games? We should find out if there is a actual min level or if someone can be rushed and host games. 07:39, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

We should find out if the mechanism is only completing TVHM or if its a minimum level as well. 15:49, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, did it seem like I was trying to invalidate your edit? I just want more information. Finding out what is true would overrule your edit, but that in no way invalidates your discovery. Notice that I brought it up to you, rather than do the research myself. 19:21, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Spatula Khan
This guy is totally legit and most of the background information is correct. He is a chef and was overthrown somehow by a guy with "weenie" in his name. Unless you've already found him, you'll have to verify what I said is accurate.

Cheers Dr. Feelgood (talk) 00:53, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

If you press 'talk', he reveals different things about his past. He has about 5 different quotes.

Dr. Feelgood (talk) 04:21, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

Page Edit
i noticed you fixed the problem on The Beard Makes the Man, where the first part of it would have a scroll button. do you know what happened, why it happened, and how to prevent?

Pmjeremy1227 (talk) 18:48, June 29, 2013 (UTC) Jeremy

The templates cleanup and stub now have a

code on them... that should prevent this in the future. 19:04, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Message in a bottle / Magny's Lighthouse edit ... why is it "unnecessary"? There's no talk about where to find the bottle, which is what I added. Kschang (talk) 16:59, July 2, 2013 (UTC)

Clarification: Message in a bottle has TWO parts... one to TRIGGER the mission (finding the bottle), and one to actually grab the loot.

I think we have a difference in aethetics... does the part about FINDING the trigger belong in the mission itself? For that, I have to say... the OTHER Message in the bottle mission wiki have them... except this one (and maybe one other). Kschang (talk) 19:48, July 2, 2013 (UTC)

Concerning the Skullmasher information for the Rakkanoth and "The Rakk Dahlia Murder" articles.
Hello, I had added the Skullsmasher to those pages as I was lucky enough to get the drop as I finished the quest. I noticed that you removed the information from all the pages, and I would like to discuss with you the reason why. If it's because there was no photographic or videographic proof added with the information I can farm Rakkanoth with FRAPS running in order to get the rifle again. Shaowstrike (talk) 03:21, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Bad Hair Day. I agree that it was a minor, non-essential tip... but it was brief, directly on-topic, potentially helpful to some players, and on a stub page that explictly asks to be expanded.

I get it; you have to compromise between "comprehensive" and "succinct", but come on -- much of that existing page is taken up with examples of low-rarity weapon variants, yet my 11 words were unnecessary clutter? Sollipsist (talk) 18:21, July 13, 2013 (UTC)

Slagga
You need to stop undoing everything you cant confirm yourself. The editor has over 300 edits and is in good standing. The purpose of a wiki that anyone can edit, is simply that... allow people to edit and get information for you. 01:37, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry if the above sounded harsh... I understand that you are a guardian of the wiki and for the most part, you do a good job. You may want to check the editors contributions and block log before simply taking away their ability to add stuff to the wiki. 01:46, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

Let me expand on the above. There are two major theories concerning user related editing on a wiki. The first is to safeguard every edit and keep the wiki pure as possible. The second is to allow everyone to edit what they want and wait until they all stop editing to go ahead and fix everything.

A good combination of the two is advisable. The drawbacks of the first theory is that you can become burnt out by the flood and its a lot of work, plus peeps get annoyed about it. The drawbacks of the second is that things might slip into the wiki that are false and its a lot of work later.

What is good about both theories is that everyone has back-up with other trusted users. It becomes a core community that both safeguards and cleans up.

One thing to remember is that the wiki will always be there and will always need that core to function well. The information will eventually work itself out if the core community is strong. I hope I have made it clear that I consider you to be one of those strong members. 16:56, July 19, 2013 (UTC)

Question.
Hi, I am wondering why you are removing my edits? Sure they are not the best, but they contained information. Couldn't you edit my edits.

Thanks, ˜˜˜Ãgamer100

Modded skins
Now that the cat is out of the bag, I can extrapolate without protecting anyone. Modders have been dropping off Modded skins for players, including the krieg event skins and for all the characters that are supposed to be gearbox employee only skins. I am not sure why the skins exist or how they can be modded, just that they are.

Even though this is not the players fault for the Modders dropping them off, people have a stigma against modders and have been heckling the players in game. They are shy to post them on the wiki talk pages, for this reason. 20:41, August 2, 2013 (UTC)

New Guide page and Category
I would like your opinion on the final analysis of this proposal. Thanks. 03:02, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism?
How can a user be doing vandalism by following the policy of this wiki? I am not getting on you about it, I am just trying to understand your reasoning because I truly don't see how someone who is following policy (adding what they believe to be correct) and has taken it to the talk page (per policy), can be considered vandalism when we are supposed to assume good faith (per policy).

I am at a loss, is all. I mean why wouldn't you respond on the talk page, rather than say its vandalism? 10:10, August 4, 2013 (UTC)

Edit wars are allowed on this wiki. An adim reverted a users edit with the summary of "the constructor stops now. need to get close to get it moving". The user could have reverted warblades edit, in order to enter into a edit war. Instead, the user made a statement on the talk page, and the intent of adding the information again.

Entering into an edit war with an admin is allowed and not vandalism (although it might be riskier because the admin may abuse power and ban the user). Just letting you know that its not vandalism. Vandalism is intentionally trying to harm the wiki or insisting against policy.

I have not personally checked out the (possible) glitch myself so I cannot comment, or with any true understanding, enter into the edit war.

If you make the statement of vandalism, it is suppressive behavior. I know you believed it at the time, which is why I am telling you. If Warblade did the same, I would be on his talk page (I do not believe he would). 19:28, August 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * Re: "Edit wars are allowed on this wiki." No. Edits warring is forbidden. We generally allow someone to push their opinion a couple of times, which generally receive cautionary notes in reply. If they hit four they're into block territory, sometimes three depending on the quality of the edit or conduct of the editor. This is roughly following Wikipedia's three revert rule. -- WarBlade (talk) 00:17, August 5, 2013 (UTC)

@ warblade- This is the first I have heard about that. Its a good idea, in fact. Should we include that, or a link, in the category:policy sections? The policy section and links are void of that idea as of now, as far as I can see. The definition should be concrete concerning bans.

@InfinitysCross- No, this is not about using a term loosely or not understanding the definition. Its about claiming vandalism when there is none. "Don't add the same note again; it will count as vandalism"  Is not a loose use of the term, it borders on threat and is confusing to the user who, as far as the user is concerned, did what the policy of the wiki asks such as "be bold", "take it to the talk page", and "ignore the rules".

Again, I am not trying to get on you... The talk page has been opened for debate on the subject, there is no need for loose terms to be thrown around. 08:15, August 5, 2013 (UTC)

Different note
Instead of coming on your talk page every time there is a problem, I would like to take the time to tell you the things that I appreciate about you. These qualities are invaluable to a wiki. I apologize if I don't express this enough. I really do not mean to fill up your talk page with defining problems, which may result in apparent negativity. I am glad your a integral part of this wiki. 17:56, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) I am glad that you take every instance to learn more. I have seen the results come to fruition before.
 * 2) You are a guardian of the wiki, not of your own content (You have no idea how refreshing that is).
 * 3) You possess the cocky-ness needed but also have some of the open-mindedness to take a step back.
 * 4) You have the ability to be silly as well, this works great in chat situations and on talk pages.
 * 5) You observe what is going on, this may result in error but you fix it and press on anyway.
 * 6) You believe everything you do is correct, given your observations (no one has to worry about your good faith).
 * 7) You are extremely logical, which allows all of the above to take place.

Regarding Butt Stallion
I'm noticing a lot of people adding that trivia note about MLP on the Butt Stallion page. I was wondering if something like:


 * a note like that mentioned above will likely not be removed, if added, as it will remain hidden. however, such speculation, and the removal thereof, is stipulated in this wiki's trivia policy.

03:35, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

Better safe than sorry. Hopefully the note will prevent the constant trivia spamming (for lack of a better term in my head at this time) about My Little Pony. 03:43, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

I have changed the note to reflect trivia and wiki policy. 10:50, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

EDIT: I have also opened the Butt Stallion talk page.

Now you may revert MLP trivia on the Butt Stallion page with the summary of "per talk" and it explains everything, gives the User a chance to add talk comments, and (if they do) allows you to thrash those poor pre-teens with some logic. 11:24, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

Official
I have official apologized to Acegikmo31 on behalf of the wiki. I have also linked the Simplified ruleset to the three revert rule for official clarity and consistency in use. I am glad that the wiki has benefited and that differences were worked out. 13:07, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

I am glad that you personally apologized but no one thinks your stupid. Your just observing and going with your gut on stuff... No one can blame you for that. I am just glad that you learn more and more. Observation is a great way to learn, as well, so dont be so hard on yourself. Your a good dude so stop it LOL. 19:44, August 9, 2013 (UTC)

Handsome Jacks Mask
I have come up with a solution to explain Handsome Jack's Mask and published it on the Gaige/Skins page. See if you concur with the information given your Xbox experience and let me know so I can align the other pages to it.

Note that I did not watch your link on User_Talk:LordShaft666 (it was too long). If you feel any relevant information should be added from that vid, then let me know or add it. Thanks. 11:22, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

I have been busy and havent played for a while. What context are the new skins? Are they paid content? They look cool. 22:48, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

Also more skins are coming from the link at the bottom of this page. 22:55, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

Legendary Nurse reference
Why do you keep removing the trivia from the Legendary Nurse?

Is there some kind of problem with the reference?

Hate9 (talk) 00:57, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about the reference then...

I WANT TO KNOW WHY?
ummm was u just like watching the updates and deleting s*** as u like cos i had literally edited tiny tina's assault on dragon keap and like not even 3 seconds after i published the piece i wrote u deleted it why what is with people like u deleting stuff u dont agree o well why i dont see what was wrong with just pointing out that the DLC borrows elements from fantasy genre mostly dark souls, lord of the rings and game of thrones whats wrong with that pleas tell me id like to know.Beast of burden (talk) 01:23, September 7, 2013 (UTC)

ok i see where your coming from but i was trying to point out the genres that are actually referenced because unless u played it or find it on a page u wont know it's just i thought it would give people an easier time then looking around on page after page is all i dont see why people dont message people and explain they just go BANG delete never look back this has happened to me 7 times now.

Beast of burden (talk) 01:33, September 7, 2013 (UTC)

I do apologize for my misspellings im dyslexic and i do not know how to use spell check on wiki

Beast of burden (talk) 01:48, September 7, 2013 (UTC)

There was a summary with the Reverts. These were found in Special:WikiActivity at the time. These were short explanations on why the edits were reverted. It is good to take it to a talk page though, thanks for doing that. If you would like to know what the summaries were, we can provide that for you. 06:03, September 7, 2013 (UTC)

FU*K YOU
wtf did you do to my L0aD3d page??!! 19:49, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

i had all this writing i did on it and it all dissapeared. WHY? B(A)rderlands

For All Your Claptrap Needs! 20:11, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Hello;

You reverted a change I made on The Warrior. The Warrior has 6 legs. See screenshot.

http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/576748250780752638/8F22162C65D0324FF295838A0A82F61A30B9BB51/1024x640.resizedimage

PwrSurge (talk) 03:22, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Why do you hate me!
WHy?

Catch-A--Ride Quotes
Should Scooter's catch-a-ride quotes be on his page or the catch-a-ride page?

Dr. Feelgood (talk) 05:51, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Shift codes
As a expert (compared to me) at twitter and such... I thought I would bring to your attention the lack of updates on the shift code page. I go to a different source for shift codes because of this. Is this something you would like to take over? If so, I will give you all my links and research.

As of right now, I have settled on a page that is extremely accurate. I would just copy the contents of that page to this wiki but that seems kinda lame. I was thinking that you might come up with something better. Either way, I think you would be ideal for the job. 06:04, September 16, 2013 (UTC)

It would be your decision. If I were to take it over, it would be more like mindless data entry rather than with more knowledge (the way I think you could provide). In the end I guess it would be more data entry than anything but you would be able to cross reference things much better for confirmation (not that it is necessary).

The reason I came to you is that I think you are the best one for the job, if it doesn't take away from your normal routine (which is important and I am sure Warblade appreciates it). Which is why you need to make that decision. I defiantly wouldn't want it to interfere and I can do it. I will talk to you more on steam about it (when we are in the same time frame). 04:47, September 17, 2013 (UTC)

Barkley Badge
During a conversation with Dr.F a while ago, he informed me that your user specific template was in mainspace and could (as such) be used by anyone. It is also not sanctioned by Dr. F so I moved your template to your space (User:InfinitysCross/Barkleybadge) and provided all those badges in use with the new code:

This gives 2 major advantages. The first is that you completely own the Badge and can cry foul if someone in the future uses it without your permission (which could not happen while it was in mainspace, being even more of public property). The second is that during administrative duties (including bots), none can delete your template. 04:03, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

Ubox revival
Everyone is busy so many in the community are going to tackle the Ubox revival (BL2) in the Ubox sandbox. If you have time or inclination, I invite you to join this community effort that is probably going to get done slowly. I may have time for 1 or 2 (hopefully more). One at a time is how we will prevail. 16:31, October 3, 2013 (UTC)

I started a vote, please check it out:

http://borderlands.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Pure_Gun_Images_for_BL2_Gun_Pages

MattoFrank (talk) 20:41, November 10, 2013 (UTC) MattoFrank

Image policy update
I have made a forum to combine all the current events. Please add any policy that you have concern with and vote. 02:02, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

fyi
actually i was "editing" it but i didnt change anything i just opened edit so i could copy a user box so no need to worry, no damage was done to your page :D  00:01, December 2, 2013 (UTC)

Loot the World
Would you or Crayolaz like to take over the Loot the World page? I have (eventually) taken over the SHiFT page but I cannot confirm new QR codes for Loot the World because I do not have a Android (or the other thing). If either of you would like to take over the page, let me know.

I can make the initial set up but someone has to confirm old codes and keep it current. Thanks for your consideration. 18:27, December 25, 2013 (UTC)

Add-on content
Now that things have calmed down a bit, I have been refining the Add-on content page.

Could you bring your console experience to the page? It is mostly geared for steam, although I made steam just an example.

Most notably, the Microsoft Point system is out of date... it either needs deleted or replaced with the proper point system. Thanks for looking. 22:27, January 17, 2014 (UTC)

I did make sure to use proper grammar but thanks for the reminder