User blog comment:Chuckmoney/Wiki remains biased against the Storm/@comment-3312380-20131224032933

Universal truths aside... how about just the truth in general? It is something that goes for credibility. The fact is that only one sentence was created:

"In contrast, much like a longer range version of Thunderball Fists, Gaige has the capacity to turn Storm into a genuine nightmare for hostiles with her Little Big Trouble skill tree."

Which was changed to:

"Like with all shock weapons, Gaige has the capacity to put this weapon to a greater use with her Little Big Trouble skill tree."

This was done by a peer of yours. A normal editor with no admin or "higher up" rank than yours. Just someone who understood that saying that anything is a "genuine nightmare" is both a biased and inappropriate description.

If you lie about what edits you do, who has changed your edit, how they interacted with you and insist that your bias is just as good as any other bias, credibility goes way down. It probably looks like circling wagons when protecting truth.

Now if you would like to put all that "stuff" behind you and talk about the real problem of the page, Why don't you just edit the page and try not to be unprofessional or biased in your descriptions?

And don't bring other pages into it unless you are willing to put the work into clean up of those pages (which will eventually happen).

Focus on the page you want to change and let all that other crap go.